It is ok/good/fine for/with me？ (2025)

1Business Partner asked me about the items in agreement.
I replied"I am good with the content." i thought it meant "I agree the items"
I consulted the dictionary, it showed "be good with" means "be good at", that is totally different.

And, is " i am ok/fine with the agreement" means " i agree the agreement"?

2He said"Let’s start with you first maybe ?”
I replied" OK for me"(i want to express consent). Is it right？how about "Good/fine for me"?

When I consulted the dictionary, i lost myself again. "Good for me" means " it benefits me?". Is "good for me" is different with “OK for me"?

Easonx said:

1Business Partner asked me about the items in agreement.
I replied"I am good with the content." i thought it meant "I agree the items"
I consulted the dictionary, it showed "be good with" means "be good at", that is totally different.

And, is " i am ok/fine with the agreement" means " i agree the agreement"?

Click to expand...

"Good with" can mean "good at" in some contexts, but I think what you said is comprehensible. I think Americans use "good with" the way you used it. I would probably say something like "I am happy with the agreement" or "I have no objections to anything in the agreement".

I don't recommend using "I am ok/fine with the agreement". This is odd. It would be better to say "The agreement is fine/ok."

lingobingo said:

To be good with something can mean to be content/happy with something as it stands / in its present form — satisfied with how it is. That’s the case here, I think. But what exactly he meant by it is anybody’s guess…

Click to expand...

Thank you. O(∩_∩)O
Is" ok/fine/good for me" in Pic 2 correct?

Tegs said:

"Good with" can mean "good at" in some contexts, but I think what you said is comprehensible. I think Americans use "good with" the way you used it. I would probably say something like "I am happy with the agreement" or "I have no objections to anything in the agreement".

I don't recommend using "I am ok/fine with the agreement". This is odd. It would be better to say "The agreement is fine/ok."

Click to expand...

Thank you. It is pretty clear. How's "OK/Good/fine for me" in Pic2?

Easonx said:

Thank you. It is pretty clear. How's "OK/Good/fine for me" in Pic2?

Click to expand...

I wouldn't personally use that. As a general comment to signify agreement to what's been suggested or proposed it's fine, but if it's supposed to denote approval of the terms of an agreement, I don't really think it works: it sounds a bit odd to me.

DonnyB said:

I wouldn't personally use that. As a general comment to signify agreement to what's been suggested or proposed it's fine, but if it's supposed to denote approval of the terms of an agreement, I don't really think it works: it sounds a bit odd to me.

Click to expand...

Got it. So the better answer should be "OK". What would you usually say other than "OK"? Because i think i use "OK/Good!" too often and the use a single word to reply a long suggestion seems a little casual

Tegs said:

"Good with" can mean "good at" in some contexts, but I think what you said is comprehensible. I think Americans use "good with" the way you used it. I would probably say something like "I am happy with the agreement" or "I have no objections to anything in the agreement".

I don't recommend using "I am ok/fine with the agreement". This is odd. It would be better to say "The agreement is fine/ok."

Click to expand...

Good with is used like good at when an object follows? Like " He is good with a sword"

vladv said:

Good with is used like good at when an object follows? Like " He is good with a sword"

Click to expand...

Thank you. So that depends on the context and the word in the wake of "with"

LVRBC said:

For me, vague expressions like, "I'm good" and "that's okay" belong in casual situations. I would never use them in discussing a contract, even in an email. I would say something like, "I agree with the contents of the contract you sent on June 18." You never know when contract talk may become legal and formal later, when you don't expect it. Work may look like a friendly situation... until it isn't.

Click to expand...

Thanks. You are right. I should be more prudent and using accurate words when i face the formal issue. And the words refect a business man's profession

DonnyB said:

I wouldn't personally use that. As a general comment to signify agreement to what's been suggested or proposed it's fine, but if it's supposed to denote approval of the terms of an agreement, I don't really think it works: it sounds a bit odd to me.

Click to expand...

I see a clip “would it be OK with you if I~". It is American English？in casual circumstance？

lingobingo said:

“Would it be OK with you if …?” is entirely normal in any branch of English

Click to expand...

Could I rely the question like" it is totally ok with me,if ……" so " it is ok with me" should be common if i want to reply"Yes"Am i right？

Yes, it works as a question or a statement.

It’s OK with me if such-and-such happens. ​

It’s fine by me if such-and-such happens. ​

But note that (for no logical reason!) we don’t normally use fine in questions:

Is it OK with you if such-and-such happens? Yes, it’s fine by me. ​

Is it fine by you if such-and-such happens? ​

​

Please tell me if my sentence is OK. / Is my sentence OK? Yes, it’s fine. ​

Please tell me if my sentence is fine. / Is it fine? ​